if we’re really committed to diversity, crying should be okay

Why is it socially acceptable to ostracise, but not to show emotion?

Charles T. Gray

I’m currently working on R-Curious, a workshop hosted by R-Ladies.

Something that bothers me about workshop convention is the trap of copy and paste code. I want to develop a system of pseudo code that is easily discernable by newbies. I wonder if something like this already exists?

As a piano teacher, I found it was dramatic how important it was to make sure the student was doing, thinking for themselves.

For example, I think there is a difference betwen presenting new R coders with




# Now let's try to install a package called "tidyverse"

I have seen people beside me at workshops run code and declare they have learnt a great deal. However, simply running someone else’s code only demonstrates that they know how to write it and you know how to run it.

As an educator, I think this is the question that has most interested me in the last six years of lecturing and speaking. I don’t have a solution, but I’m going to experiment with how little prescriptive code I can have in my workshop.

In a workshop environment, can’t we all use cheatsheets and tutorials, just as we do when we are working alone? Why not have searching for solutions online be part of the workshop?

But now I fret that not everyone will have internet access.


For attribution, please cite this work as

Gray (2018, July 18). measured.: if we're really committed to diversity, crying should be okay. Retrieved from https://fervent-hypatia-7b7343.netlify.com/posts/2018-11-12-if-were-really-committed-to-diversity-crying-should-be-okay/

BibTeX citation

  author = {Gray, Charles T.},
  title = {measured.: if we're really committed to diversity, crying should be okay},
  url = {https://fervent-hypatia-7b7343.netlify.com/posts/2018-11-12-if-were-really-committed-to-diversity-crying-should-be-okay/},
  year = {2018}